Warblogging died in 2006. It died when the military and US government decided that ANY servicemember’s content online must be approved through the chain of command, AFTER informing the command that that content MAY exist. (i.e. registering one’s blog even without posting content to it)
The message coming out of Iraq was warped after this decision. Crowdsourcing what was happening in Iraq and Afghanistan halted. We had to rely on embeds and independent journalists (Michael Yon continues to be excellent), and of course, brutal, savage terrorist/insurgent attacks to figure out what was really going on.
I attended the senior Yahoo! fellow Gaurav Mishra’s talk at the Institute for the Study of Diplomacy last week, on the subject of citizen journalism/media during the Mumbai Attacks. You can read about Gaurav’s coverage of the Mumbai attacks on his own blog. Gaurav talked about how people were now able to report instantly from the scene.
He had me say some words about my own situation, where I had to remove content from my web site to include photos from Iraq and my journal on my deployment to Iraq, after my command found out and I got in heaps of trouble for it.
This “war” is going to be over soon, yet not as quickly as I’d like. But I guarantee you, when the smoke clears, there will be a TON of stuff coming online written by the troops on what has been happening over there. That the military said we couldn’t post it online didn’t mean that soldiers weren’t still lying in their hooches, writing long rants on how fucked up or how successful it was over there to their loved ones. Soldiers, Marines, and others were still snapping photos and taking video of what they saw. All that stuff is out there NOW, but it is underground.
It will bubble to the surface once all these people feel that it is safe to do so. You will probably see more books published again. Few would be worth reading. But that’s not the point. The point is that they will have the ability to express themselves again.
About the best we’ve had lately is a book written by a pseudonymous former Army interrogator who decried US torture practices, and a 60 Minutes interview by a pseudonymous former Delta operator who said his team could have had a good shot at killing Osama bin Laden in the early stages of the “war” in Afghanistan.
Pseudonymity, anonymity…both are great ways to circumvent broken systems.
You can also expect revelations, scandals, and investigations to come soon for other related reasons. The changing of the political appointees and DC guard will bring out exposés on the Bush Administration. The financial crisis will expose the corruption in Wall Street (like the latest hedge fund/NYC investor scam). Much of the rot that’s spread as a result of Dubya will get exposed. I should add that it’s not that the Democrats are not a part of it too — the politicians all had their hand in the till.
The flood of information that people didn’t want you to hear is coming.
edit: Newsweek just did a great story about Thomas Tamm, the guy who gave the New York Times a heads-up on the wiretapping scandal that would later emerge as a collage of different whistleblowers’ reports. People won’t be as afraid to report, once the horrible Bush Administration leaves.
My buddy d14n wrote a blog post about Tamm also, and he verified the info on how and where to contribute to the Thomas Tamm Legal Defense Trust.